My comment on a religious message board in which most believed that there was no evidence for a global flood:
It bothers me that we use "evidence" to prove there was no global flood but yet "evidence" also points to no God.
I say just forget about "evidence" for religious truths and take them for what they are- true stories that bring us closer to our Maker
It cannot ever be proven that there was or was not a global flood any more than you can prove the existence of God so alleged evidence either way becomes irrelevant.
To me, it is just a confusing position to take citing evidence in one direction and not the other.